Engar skošanir kannašar

Ķ sķšustu vinnuviku voru birtar nišurstöšur śr fimm skošanakönnunum į fimm dögum um fylgi flokkanna ķ komandi kosningum. Nś eru fjórir dagar til kosninga og engar fréttir af fylgiskönnunum ķ fjóra daga.

Fékk einhver kaupandi svo slęma nišurstöšu aš hann vill ekki birta hana af ótta viš skošanamyndandi įhrif? Eša eru allir aš bķša fram į sķšustu stundu til aš geta stįtaš af žvķ aš hafa komist nęst śrslitum? Ętli seinni skżringin sé ekki lķklegri.


Tvęr ESB kannanir

Hins vegar er Félagsvķsindastofnun bśin aš kanna hug manna til žess aš „ljśka višręšum" annars vegar og aš ganga ķ Evrópusambandiš hins vegar. Sem fyrr er meirihluti fyrir žvķ aš „ljśka višręšum" og į sama tķma vill ķviš stęrri meirihluti, um 65% žeirra sem taka afstöšu, ekki ganga ķ ESB.

Svipaš var uppi į teningunum ķ sķšustu viku. Könnun 365 sżndi aš meirihluti vill „ljśka višręšum" į mešan könnun MMR sem birtist sama dag sżndi aš 69% žeirra sem tóku afstöšu er į móti ašild. Sś nišurstaša rataši einhverra hluta vegna ekki inn ķ fréttatķmana.

En ESB mįliš er bara ekki efst į dagskrį nśna. Žaš er meira spennandi aš sjį eitthvaš um fylgi flokkanna nś žegar kosningar eru aš bresta į. Nżtt žing og nż rķkisstjórn mun įkveša um framhald Evrópumįla og vonandi virša leikreglur lżšręšisins og leyfa žjóšinni aš taka žįtt ķ žeirra įkvöršun.


mbl.is Meirihluti į móti inngöngu ķ ESB
Tilkynna um óvišeigandi tengingu viš frétt

« Sķšasta fęrsla | Nęsta fęrsla »

Athugasemdir

1 Smįmynd: Įsthildur Cesil Žóršardóttir

Žaš sįst til dęmis ķ dag aš Dögun var komin yfir 5% mörkin ķ einum könnunum, svo var hśn skyndilega tekin af dagskrį.  Žaš skyldi žó aldrei vera aš nżju frambošin vęru aš skora of hįtt fyrir hjartaš ķ fjór/fimmflokknum. 

Hvaš varšar ESB, žį er žaš hreinlega lygi aš viš séum ķ samningavišręšum, viš erum ķ einföldu ašlögunarferli žar sem ekkert er um aš semja, engar varanlega undanžįgur.  Ótrślegt aš žessi lygi skuli fį aš ganga svona óįreitt. 

http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/publication/20110725_understanding_enlargement_en.pdf

New members are admitted with the

unanimous consent of the democratically

elected governments of the EU Member

States, coming together either in the Council of

Ministers or in the European Council.

When a country applies to join the EU, the

Member States’ governments, represented in

the Council, decide – after receiving an opinion

from the Commission – whether or not to accept

the application and recognise the country as a

candidate. Similarly, the Member States decide when

and on what terms to open and to close accession

negotiations with candidates on each policy area,

in the light of recommendations from the European

Commission.

Who decides?

And it is the Member States who decide when

accession negotiations are satisfactorily completed.

The Accession Treaty has to be signed by every

Member State and the candidate concerned. It

then has to be ratified by each Member State

and the acceding country according to their own

constitutionally established procedures. The

European Parliament, whose members are elected

directly by the EU’s citizens, also has to give its

consent.

Accession negotiations

Accession negotiations concern the candidate’s

ability to take on the obligations of membership.

The term “negotiation” can be misleading.

Accession negotiations focus on the conditions and

timing of the candidate’s adoption, implementation

and application of EU rules – some 100,000 pages of

them. And these rules (also known as the acquis,

French for “that which has been agreed”) are not

How the enlargement process works:

meeting the requirements

negotiable. For candidates, it is essentially a

matter of agreeing on how and when to adopt and

implement EU rules and procedures. For the EU, it

is important to obtain guarantees on the date and

effectiveness of each candidate’s implementation

of the rules.

Negotiations are conducted between the EU

Member States and each individual candidate

country and the pace depends on each country’s

progress in meeting the requirements. Candidates

consequently have an incentive to implement the

necessary reforms rapidly and effectively. Some of

these reforms require considerable and sometimes

difficult transformations of a country’s political

and economic structures. It is therefore important

that governments clearly and convincingly

communicate the reasons for these reforms to the

citizens of the country. Support from civil society

is essential in this process. Negotiating sessions

are held at the level of ministers or deputies, i.e.

Permanent Representatives for the Member States,

and Ambassadors or Chief Negotiators for the

candidate countries.

To facilitate the negotiations, the whole body of EU

law is divided into “chapters”, each corresponding

to a policy area. The first step in negotiations is

called “screening”; its purpose is to identify areas

in need of alignment in the legislation, institutions

or practices of a candidate country

 

 

Įsthildur Cesil Žóršardóttir, 23.4.2013 kl. 22:01

2 Smįmynd: Jón Steinar Ragnarsson

http://neiesb.is/2013/04/spurningarnar-i-skodanakonnun-frettabladsins-og-stodvar2/

Jón Steinar Ragnarsson, 24.4.2013 kl. 15:47

Bęta viš athugasemd

Ekki er lengur hęgt aš skrifa athugasemdir viš fęrsluna, žar sem tķmamörk į athugasemdir eru lišin.

Innskrįning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveikiš į Javascript til aš hefja innskrįningu.

Hafšu samband